NOVA KINO FILMS
mark boswell
NOT FOR PROFIT: A CERTAIN HISTORY OF THE FILM COLLECTIVE AND UNDERGROUND CINEMA
2014. Power Point Essay. DUSHANBE, TAJIKISTAN
above photo: Soviet era film propaganda bunker, Tajikistan
This lecture was presented as part of the "Reimagining the New Man: Practicing Civic Duties through Debates, Social and Visual Media." Dushanbe, Tajikistan 2014. Published by the Dushanbe Art Ground.
NOT FOR PROFIT: A Certain History of the Film Collective and Underground Cinema
The history of independent film collectives is also the simultaneous history of
underground cinema as both have operated over time on a similar parallel track
that has consistently folded into each other. Prototypically inhabiting a demimonde
of avant-gardists, non-conformists, and visionaries who saw no place for
themselves inside any version of commercial cinema production. The first Film
Collectives started to surface in the early 1960ʼs as 16mm film cameras and
editing equipment became more mobile and affordable. Collectivizing meant
more access to the necessary equipment to make a film as well as the addition of
human energy that is so critical to the dynamic complexities of the medium.
Notable, were the 1962 formation of The Filmmakers Cooperative in New York
City by the Lithuanian immigrant Jonas Mekas as well the founding of the London
Filmmakers Coop in 1968.
Other Collectives shot up during this same period across Western Europe and
North America. The political conditions in the Soviet Union during the same time,
allowed for a different model, in most cases an “amateur film club” where noncommercial
films could be made and exhibited with a certain amount of state
oversight. Because the Soviet Union was already technically a “collective nation”
– avant-garde filmmakers were typically welcomed into the subsystem of film
production as long as they produced films under the rubric of “Soviet Realism.”
Two Armenian directors Sergei Paradonov and Artavazd Peleshyan, who both
studied at the prestigious VDIK film school in Moscow, are excellent examples of
avant-garde filmmaking in the USSR. Paradonovʼs personal lifestyle attracted
harsh retribution by Soviet authorities because of his illicit homosexual practices.
Similarly in the West, notorious Underground film screenings would be severely
visited by the police, where filmmakers would be arrested; projectors would be
seized, for the showing of controversial material. The western cooperatives were
uniformly run by Underground filmmakers themselves, who utilized the facilities
to better organize their own film production capabilities as to create an
environment where “any” kind of film could be made, exhibited, and distributed
without censorship.
What does this term “Underground Cinema” essentially mean? An Underground
film is typically a film made without any censorship constraints on a very small
budget where the means of exhibition will be limited to artist driven/noncommercial
venues or literally “some dark room in the cellar with folding chairs
and a projector.” This does not mean that the film could have some kind of
second life; as in “be discovered” by an important institutional curator and then
become somehow part of the art world where true commerce takes place. The
underground filmmaker typically enjoys the liberty to express themselves
sexually, politically, and artistically in a variety of different genres or conceptual
concerns. As unabashed nudity shot under poor lighting conditions was
something that typically was considered to be a staple of the underground film, it
is often overlooked how many actual films of a more conceptual/artistic nature
were produced with very high quality production values.
Underground cinema essentially began as an avant-garde expression of various
art movements (Futurism, Dadaism, Constructivism, Surrealism) that began in
Western Europe, Russia, and the United States in the 1920ʼs. Salvador Dali and
Luis Bunuelʼs collaborative short film “Un Chien Andalou” was a pivotal moment
in the ability of the avant-garde to shock the public in a way that caused a
notorious amount of attention. The crucial point here is that inside this de facto
underground, there were no restrictions at all regarding the type of content that
could be produced.
Certainly, Dali and Bunuel were more closely linked to Bourgeoisie money
machines than most typical underground filmmakers of the future, but what is
critical about this film, is how it inspired so many artists afterward to make future
works without concern of institutional scorn, middle class objections or
bourgeoisie outrage, or even fear of arrest. The Original “Cinema 16” in Paris
where “Un Chien” opened, was assaulted by the authorities on numerous
occasions during its initial run.
After the wild years of 1920ʼs rebellion and especially the antics of the Dada and
Surrealistic movements calmed down, there was very little influential activity in
regards to production of avant-garde/underground films except for the case of
Maya Deren. Deren was a Jewish immigrant to the United States from Kiev,
Ukraine. She was a trained choreographer who became fascinated in filmmaking
as a way to capture the ephemeral within a cinematic experience. Her seminal
film “Meshes in the Afternoon” was monumental in the way it influenced so many
other artists to see the possibilities of telling a story in a truly artistic,
hallucinatory, and unconventional manner.
1960: The New American Cinema and the New York Underground cinema
essentially exploded in New York City just before formation of the New York
Filmmakers Cooperative. Independent Directors like John Cassavettes, Albert
Leslie, Robert Frank, and Shirley Clarke, were very concerned that the types of
films they were interested in making would not receive financing or distribution.
Effectively they wanted to remain “above ground” as the underground had no
concerns about being accepted into the conventional paths of production and
distribution. Conversely filmmakers like Jack Smith, Kenneth Anger, and Andy
Warhol started creating short, experimental films of highly controversial nature,
reminiscent of the volatile twenties, and projecting them in underground spaces
in New Yorkʼs ghetto ridden East Village. On September 28, 1960, a number of
these filmmakers assembled in the office of a sympathetic New York producer
and declared that: “we reject censorship” and emphasized that film was “a
personal expression.” They demanded a means to create financing and
distribution for these kinds of films. The avant-gardists on one hand wanted
nothing to do with this pseudo merger with the “above ground.” ”We donʼt want
false, polished, slick films- we prefer them rough, alive-we want them the color of
blood.” In 1962, Jonas Mekas, the strong willed experimental filmmaker from
Lithuania founded the infamous “New York Filmmakers Cooperative.” They
declared that no film sent to them for distribution would be denied. They had a
collectivist/anarchistic mind set. They were against bureaucratic elitism and for
the actual artist as everyman.
As the New York Filmmakers Cooperative became a permanent not-for-profit
venue focused more on the exhibition and distribution of underground films, it
was clear that a more purposeful film production cooperative was missing within
the city. A place where an artist could walk in the door with enough money to eat
a fairly nice dinner and instead make a film. This was the beginning of the
Millennium Film Workshop. And their raison dʼetre was: "To offer the noncommercial
film artist -of whatever experience, or proven degree of proficiency,
and without interference in either film-subject or style -the use without cost, or at
minimal cost, of the tools of filmmaking, instruction in filmmaking, and a means of
contacting others of like creative interest." This statement is the de facto motto of
any film collective that has ever risen up from a moldy garage to a hidden corner
of an empty factory. Always working in a challenged architectural space with little
or no budget, with a variety of combative personalities, and a great passion for
the unhinged artistic purpose, which ultimately causes great friction and even
self-destruction.
This type of model was the standard bearer across Western Europe and North
America. CO-OPʼs blossomed up all over the Cold War map of the west, some
faded away into the dustbin of history and others still exist to this day.
In 1984 in San Francisco, California, a small underground ground post-60ʼs
collective was formed named Artist Television Access. This was a Collective
entering the new era of not only filmmaking, but also video production. ATA, as it
is known locally, offered the choice of working on either film or video as well as
the possibility of screening the finished product in their eccentric showroom on
Valencia Street. Fast Forward to 2014 and think of all those private, slick
corporate busses carting young tech geeks heading out to their daily jobs at
Google, Yahoo, E-bay, in the nearby Silicon Valley as they walk by ATA each
morning to get their latteʼs before boarding the corporate train.
The most remarkable aspect of ATAʼs long run as one of the most innovative
underground screening spaces in North America, is not itsʼ fortitude to be able
survive numerous gentrification onslaughts, rent increases, or internal disputes;
but its ability to continue to permanently house the living intellectual and spiritual
embodiment of the collective movement in the form of a cinematic dynamo
named Craig Baldwin. Mr. Baldwin Is a San Francisco based “found footage”
filmmaker, media activist, and Director of the spectacular screening series inside
ATA called “OTHER CINEMA.” The Other Cinema presents films and videos
from artists from all over the world every Saturday night in specially curated
shows by Craig Baldwin. The show themes range anywhere from sexploitation to
subversive forms of political detournement. With relentless energy and a fierce
intellect, Craig Baldwin consistently programs outstanding cutting edge work that
often much later will catch the eye of more established museum venues or
independent art spaces. He lives in the cellar of the ATA space with a giant
collection of 16mm films, vhs tapes, and DVDʼs. Typically, a newly acquired
16mm film will be seen running non-stop in this non-stop film bunker outfitted with
edit stations and screening rooms as well as sleeping quarters. He also
distributes work on his OTHER CINEMA DVD distribution label and is always
willing to consider new works for possible exhibition from strangers from around
the world. This kind of remarkable programming and economic efficiency has
inspired numerous underground filmmakers in the U.S. and elsewhere to begin
similar collective projects.
In 1992, in Miami Beach, Florida; myself and a group of other filmmakers
founded the Alliance Film Video Cooperative with a 15,000 grant from the city of
Miami. The only stipulation to the grant was that all the equipment had to be open
to the public and free of commercial interest. We found a cheap studio within an
art collective and donated all of our personal equipment to the coop. We had
16mm and super-8 film cameras as well as video production and post-production
materials. The business model for the coop was that we would charge a small fee
for membership, which would then allow artists to rent equipment and editing
stations for also very little money. The staff of the coop would not be paid a
salary but were allowed to teach classes and keep the tuition. To open the
collective up to the public, we contacted the media and announced an opening
party where anybody in the city of Miami could bring out a 5 minute or less video
or film and we would screen it. A keg of beer on ice was also on hand for anyone
with a thirst. This attracted a giant crowd and we screened movies into all hours
of the night and signed up about fifty new members. From there we started two
different film and video screening series. Cinema Vortex, a weekly presentation
of 16mm films from the Miami Dade Public Library that included avant-garde,
experimental, French new Wave and American noir, as well as classic Hollywood
auteur cinema. The second series was “Sick, Sick Cinema” – curated by
underground noise musician –Tom Smith. Sick, Sick Cinema featured the most
important sexploitation films from the 1960ʼs and 1970ʼs with titles like “Bad Girls
Go To Hell,” Too Much, Too Often” and “Faster Pussy Cat, Kill, Kill, Kill.” To give
coop members a chance to screen works, we founded the “Anti Film Festival.”
We werenʼt against film, but we were against the idea of film festivals as
place to sell your film to the market. We wanted wild works of experimental,
poetic, and political nature. The festivals were very popular as were the weekly
screening series. We expanded our space, bought new equipment and offered
more classes. More members arrived and bigger grants from different
organizations. Often, filmmakers who recently escaped from Cuba would show
up at our door on a monthly basis wanting to get in on the action. Of course with
the growth, there were arguments about the direction the coop was going and
concerns about what the money was being spent on. Staff members got fired for
mishandling money or seeking personal enrichment without benefit to the coop.
At the same time the membership was extremely loyal and we always had an
array of volunteers ready to do anything. Miami Beach at the time was a place in
total transition. The beautiful art deco hotels of today were mostly empty and
degrading at that time, ideal for film locations or squats The impact of cocaine
and the deportation of 200,000 criminals and mental patients by Fidel Castro had
an enormous negative impact on the community during the mid-eighties. The
murder rate rose overnight. This degradation lasted up until the mid-nighties,
when the main historical district of Miami Beach, which houses the majority of the
art deco masterpieces from the 1920ʼs, had been declared an architectural
landmark zone. Greedy Landlords and zealous Real Estate developers started
smelling the potential influx of unending dollars. Rents were suddenly rising at an
alarming rate.
One of the Coopʼs main screening facilities, which was loaned to
us for free, was located in the first gay bar in Miami Beach, that had been shut
down by city authorities for sanitation violations had now been sold to the GAP
clothing store. The rent for our main cinema had been raised by 300 percent.
This was the most important independent cinema in Miami and nothing could be
done. The beautiful people were moving in and gentrification was in full capitalist
assault mode. The writing was on the wall, the days of the Alliance Film Video
Cooperative were numbered. The year was 1996, we decided to give it twelve
more months, then turn it over to someone else. Life had become two expensive
on Miami Beach for an artist to survive. Within the oncoming year, ten influential
members of the collective had all moved to San Francisco. My wife and I were
preparing to leave town, when news came out over the radio that Gianni Versace
had been shot down on the streets of Miami Beach by an insane serial killer, it
was definitely time to leave. We were heading WEST, to the golden land of
California. What shall we do when we get there? It took about two weeks to drive
the massive voyage from east coast to west, stopping at all the right spots in no
general hurry towards our quest for the next filmic utopia. The first day I arrived in
San Francisco, I walked down to the Mission District with an eager step and
entered the ATA doors at 922 Valencia and introduced myself to Craig Baldwin,
the keeper of the flame.